Featured Post

Hottest Girls on Facebook & Their Sexy Profile Pictures

A lot of sexy Facebook cuties. 1 2 3 4 5   6 7 8 9 ...

Post Top Ad

Showing posts with label still. Show all posts
Showing posts with label still. Show all posts

Friday, December 21, 2012

7:25 PM

Despite APIcalypse SEOs Still Need Rank Tracking Data

As you may have heard, Google is clamping own on how tool owners use their APIs. For many businesses these policy changes raise some serious concerns, and for many SEOs, the moved seemed to herald the end of their world. 

Hearing about Raventools dropping support for rank tracking next year, got me mulling over some questions. How valuable are rankings? Will our clients be upset without this data? How do we use rankings anyway? 

I’ve been doing SEO for 7+ years now, and I can’t imagine not having rankings data to see what’s working and what isn’t. As the founder of an SEO software dashboard that provides rank tracking too, I'm committed to providing rank tracking data to our customers - even if that means never having access to the Adwords API.

I decided to ask a few well-respected agency owners their thoughts on rank tracking, as well as offer a few ways I see some of our own customers using rank data.

Patrick Altoft, Direct of Search at Branded3 in the UK says rankings are valuable to his agency, writing to me in an email, he said:

"Try telling a client who makes £1m+ per year profit from a single keyword that rankings are not important.

We report on rankings and don't shy away from using them as a key metric in our campaigns. Clients understand them and as long as you tie everything back to visits, revenue and profits there is nothing wrong with that."

Joost, well known Wordpress SEO plugin author and consultant at Yoast takes a slightly different angle saying about rankings,

"…It's not a metric I often talk with clients about, but it is one of the methods I use for myself to see what's happening and whether specific keyword groups are affected. I think rankings are mostly useful in larger groups and when segmented properly."

I think Joost hits the nail on the head on why SEOs use rankings data internally: intelligence. Rank tracking data can help you identify issues and opportunities fast.

Here’s a few other ways I see our agency clients at SERPs.com using rankings data.

1. Use rankings to spot penalties and Google updates quickly

It can be really easy to identify a Google penalty using rank data. Especially in larger sites, a specific page or keyword getting penalized could get lost when just looking at higher level traffic patterns. A penalty or updates becomes very clear however when you look at a historical ranking:Ranking data that shows penalties

2. Identify high ROI keywords that rank lower than #1.

Good SEO requires hard work, execution and usually a large chunk of time and labor creating content, fixing on-page issues and defining long-term strategy. So for many marketers, rank data provides a way to identify keywords that can provide the most impact to ROI.

For many businesses a few key terms can drive a significant amount of their online business. Knowing where your key terms rank in Google, and how much traffic those terms are getting can help you identify where you spend valuable time. Key terms with significant traffic that rank 2-10 are ripe for a SEO to analyze:

Rank Data that helps identify goog ROI

3. Simplify the SEO discussion.

In a corporate environment, while SEO is more well known and respected than ever, not everyone lives and breathes it the way we do. Being able to show a simple metric that moves up or down like rankings is a way to get your team invested. It’s a simple way to show progress to others in your company that may not understand a metric like "non-branded organic traffic".

When dealing with clients who have hired you because they don’t do "computer things" rankings are often the one metric that they can understand. Higher rankings = more traffic and more revenue for their business. It just makes sense to them. They hired you so they can focus on running their business, not watching or figuring out what the heck "non-branded organic traffic" is.

Scott Hendison, aka the Search Commander, added this about how his clients view rankings, "You can tell site owners that 'rankings don't matter' until you're blue in the face, and they still want them."

4. Get more SEO budget with a rankings improvement forecast.

If you know what positions your keywords are in, and how much traffic on average they get over, say a 30-day period, it’s a pretty easy calculation to generate projected traffic if you ranked higher using one of the many CTR datasets available.

Once you know a good range of how much extra traffic you could get, you have a slam dunk, data-driven recommendation to show a boss or client on what you could do with a higher SEO budget.

5. Use rank movement to prove SEO progress is being made.

Rankings are a leading indicator. They are one of the first metrics to improve once you start a SEO campaign. A keyword moving from 50 to 20 overnight in Google won’t bring more traffic (no one goes past the first page), but it’s obvious that something changed. It’s a positive signal that you moved 30 positions in a day, even if traffic hasn’t started to increase yet.

Rank Data that shows SEO is Working

Rank tracking is useful when used intelligently.

Rank tracking is still valuable to SEOs. It’s valuable for internal SEO strategy, as well as for communicating with clients. It’s not the end-all-be-all SEO metric, nor should it be. But when combined with other metrics, it can be a very powerful tool in your SEO superbelt.

SES London

2012 was a key year in Digital Marketing. How will 2013 compare? Find out in London.

Feb 18-21, 2013: The brightest and most insightful marketing minds in the industry will be gathering at SES London. Register today.

SES New York

Improve your Online Marketing Skills at SES New York!

March 25-28, 2013: Save up to $600 with the Early Bird Rate. Receive an unparalleled education, network with your peers, and achieve results! Register today.


View the original article here

Friday, August 12, 2011

11:14 PM

Review: R.E.M.'s "Lifes Rich Pageant" still rich

By Chris Willman

Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:30pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (TheWrap) - "We are young despite the years," Michael Stipe sang 25 years ago in "These Days," trying to sound like an older man trying to sound younger. That line surely has a lot more resonance for the R.E.M. frontman now that he can sing it and mean it.

Meanwhile, fans have a fine excuse to return to the album that contained it, "Lifes Rich Pageant," a 1986 milestone that's getting the quarter-century anniversary deluxe treatment. Its defining alt-rock pageantry doesn't sound a day over 15 ... honest.

For fickle fans, "Lifes Rich Pageant" may be the easiest R.E.M. album to like -- and there are good reasons why it became their first gold record -- though diehard partisans would surely pick one of the later efforts as a favorite.

As the quartet's fourth album, it more or less marks the End of the Jangle Era. There's a deceptively forwardness to the opening track, "Begin the Begin," which, besides de-punning Cole Porter's pun, introduces the harder-edged guitar tones and more cutting vocal style that would replace their signature sound by the end of the '80s.

But for most of the rest of the original album's tracks, you still get Mike Mills' sweet background vocals and Rickenbackers galore. And what a glorious -- if, sure, slightly dated -- Roger McGuinn-goes-new-wave signature that was.

If the promise of a remastered "Fall On Me" isn't enough, the principal lure here is a bonus disc of demos recorded on the fly at an Athens, Georgia studio, well before some of the songs had been completed.

Stipe hums most of "I Believe" in place of actual lyrics, though that's not entirely different than his mumblecore vocal approach on preceding albums. You also hear Peter Buck experimenting with a wider variety of guitar sounds than he did on the finished album -- plus a few tracks that didn't make the final cut, and a lot of charmingly muffed chords on the ones that did.

So do you want to hear this seminal batch of material polished, or punky? This "Rich" two-fer gives you a choice. Ironically, the looser demo material is closer in spirit to the rougher sound the band has cultivated on underrated recent albums like 2008's high-spirited "Accelerate." They were so much older then, in the Rickenbacker years...they're younger than that now.


View the original article here

1:02 AM

Review: R.E.M.'s "Lifes Rich Pageant" still rich

By Chris Willman

Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:30pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (TheWrap) - "We are young despite the years," Michael Stipe sang 25 years ago in "These Days," trying to sound like an older man trying to sound younger. That line surely has a lot more resonance for the R.E.M. frontman now that he can sing it and mean it.

Meanwhile, fans have a fine excuse to return to the album that contained it, "Lifes Rich Pageant," a 1986 milestone that's getting the quarter-century anniversary deluxe treatment. Its defining alt-rock pageantry doesn't sound a day over 15 ... honest.

For fickle fans, "Lifes Rich Pageant" may be the easiest R.E.M. album to like -- and there are good reasons why it became their first gold record -- though diehard partisans would surely pick one of the later efforts as a favorite.

As the quartet's fourth album, it more or less marks the End of the Jangle Era. There's a deceptively forwardness to the opening track, "Begin the Begin," which, besides de-punning Cole Porter's pun, introduces the harder-edged guitar tones and more cutting vocal style that would replace their signature sound by the end of the '80s.

But for most of the rest of the original album's tracks, you still get Mike Mills' sweet background vocals and Rickenbackers galore. And what a glorious -- if, sure, slightly dated -- Roger McGuinn-goes-new-wave signature that was.

If the promise of a remastered "Fall On Me" isn't enough, the principal lure here is a bonus disc of demos recorded on the fly at an Athens, Georgia studio, well before some of the songs had been completed.

Stipe hums most of "I Believe" in place of actual lyrics, though that's not entirely different than his mumblecore vocal approach on preceding albums. You also hear Peter Buck experimenting with a wider variety of guitar sounds than he did on the finished album -- plus a few tracks that didn't make the final cut, and a lot of charmingly muffed chords on the ones that did.

So do you want to hear this seminal batch of material polished, or punky? This "Rich" two-fer gives you a choice. Ironically, the looser demo material is closer in spirit to the rougher sound the band has cultivated on underrated recent albums like 2008's high-spirited "Accelerate." They were so much older then, in the Rickenbacker years...they're younger than that now.


View the original article here

Comments System

Disqus Shortname

Author Info (Documentation Required)